Skip to main content
· 5/30/1991

Schoonover v. American Family Insurance

Citations

  • 572 N.E.2d 1258
  • 214 Ill. App. 3d 33
  • 157 Ill. Dec. 794
  • 1991 Ill. App. LEXIS 903

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that it is not the duty of the insurer to inform the insured of the contents of a contract when the contract was available for the insured’s review
  • stating that it is not the duty of the insurer to inform the insured of the contents of a contract when the contract was available for the insured's review
  • affirming summary judgment despite plaintiffs claim of estop-pel where the plaintiff was represented by counsel and the defendant insurer was not asked to provide, and did not refuse to provide, a copy of the insurance policy
  • affirming summary judgment 20 despite plaintiff’s claim of estoppel where the plaintiff was represented by counsel and the defendant insurer was not asked to provide, and did not refuse to provide, a copy of the insurance policy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Green

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.