Bielaga v. Mozdzeniak

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Evidence of drinking is so prejudicial that more than mere drinking must be shown; actual intoxication with impairment of physical or mental capabilities is required.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Sullivan-Coughlin v. Palos Country Club, Inc.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2004-06-22· cited 28×
• Hallowell v. University of Chicago Hospital
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2002-09-06· cited 20×
• Bruntjen v. Bethalto Pizza, LLC
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2014-10-28· cited 15×
• Bodkin v. 5401 S.P., Inc.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2002-03-29· cited 14×
• Sobczak v. General Motors Corp.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2007-05-23· cited 14×
• In Re ZR
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1995-08-11· cited 11×
• Sullivan-Coughlin v. Palos Country Club
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2004-06-22· cited 9×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Enis
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1990-11-30· cited 256×
• Gill v. Foster
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1993-11-18· cited 204×
• Mizowek v. De Franco
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1976-10-01· cited 168×
• Demos v. Ferris-Shell Oil Co.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2000-10-12· cited 47×
• Benuska v. Dahl
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1980-08-22· cited 33×
• Tedrowe v. Burlington Northern, Inc.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1987-07-20· cited 32×
• Wagner v. Zboncak
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1982-12-14· cited 16×
• Gilberto v. Nordtvedt
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1971-10-05· cited 14×
• Coleman v. Williams
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1976-10-15· cited 14×
• Peterson v. Ress Enterprises, Inc.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1997-09-29· cited 12×