Supreme Court· 6/30/2023

Biden v. Nebraska

Citations

600 U.S. 477

Oral argument

Argued
105 min recording
Listen

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that “the plaintiff must have suffered an injury in fact—a concrete and imminent harm to a legally protected interest, like property or money”
determining that MOHELA is an arm of the state for the purposes of Article III standing, such that the state of Missouri had standing to sue for an injury suffered by MOHELA
finding in the Article III standing context that states have standing to sue to protect their official state instrumentalities
highlighting many of the same aspects of MOHELA’s structure in its enabling act
applying the major questions doctrine to conclude that “ ‘Congress would likely have intended for itself ’ ” the task of making “ ‘[t]he basic and consequen- tial tradeoffs’ inherent in a mass debt cancellation program” (quoting West Virginia v. EPA, 597 U. S. 697, 730 (2022))
Court granted certiorari before judgment and expedited oral argument after receiving emergency application involving federal student loan forgiveness program

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: John G. Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.