Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 12/17/1980

Bickel v. Burkhart

Citations

  • 632 F.2d 1251

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • high stakes of firefighting necessitates greater operational efficiency and, therefore, courts weigh the state’s interest in regulating speech of firemen more heavily
  • fire department, like police department, has greater interest than normal government employer in maintaining morale and discipline
  • fireman’s speaking out at a public meeting indicating that his fire station was inadequately maintained and overworked constitutionally protected
  • context factor weighed in favor of employees who complained at meeting following statement by administrator that they could talk about anything that was on their minds
  • \impermissible retaliation [need] not result in the termination of his employment\ in order to be actionable under 1983, but the employer's actions must alter \important conditions of employment\
  • remarks directed at the fire department as an institution which were not made in a hostile or threatening manner and which did not interfere with the operation of the fire department held to be constitutionally protected

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ainsworth, Gee, Wisdom

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

52 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Bickel v. Burkhart

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.