Skip to main content
· 10/21/1982

Richard Williams v. The City of Valdosta

Citations

  • 689 F.2d 964
  • 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 24660

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that where a trial involved relatively straightforward issues, “highly disputed facts,” and “an absence of ‘pernicious occurrences,’ trial courts should be considerably less inclined to disturb a jury verdict’’
  • applying abuse of discretion standard to review the disposition of a new trial motion
  • reviews of an order granting a new trial will be “more rigorous” for decision based on a finding that the verdict was contrary to the great weight of the evidence, as opposed to legal error or prejudicial conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Hatchett, Ingraham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.