Court of Appeals of Washington· 7/31/1980
Bich v. General Electric Co.
Citations
- 614 P.2d 1323
- 27 Wash. App. 25
- 10 A.L.R. 4th 842
- 1980 Wash. App. LEXIS 2189
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that it was a question of fact for the jury whether the substitution of Westinghouse for General Electric fuses in a transformer constituted a substantial change
- concluding that it was a question of fact for the jury whether the substitution of Westinghouse for General Electric fuses in a transformer constituted a substantial change
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Munson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Simonetta v. Viad Corp.Washington Supreme Court· 2008-12-11· cited 68×
- The Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation , Doris Kay Dummitt v. A.W. Chesterton , The Matter of Eighth Judicial District Asbestos Litigation , Joann H. Suttner v. A.W. Chesterton CompanyNew York Court of Appeals· 2016-06-28· cited 66×
- Mitchell v. Washington State Institute of Public PolicyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2009-12-22· cited 57×
- In Re the Marriage of OchsnerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-04-29· cited 35×
- Ford Motor Co. v. WoodCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-01-08· cited 28×
- Parkins v. Van Doren Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1986-08-19· cited 21×
- Smith v. Sturm, Ruger & Co.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1985-02-05· cited 20×
- Braaten v. Saberhagen HoldingsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-01-29· cited 12×
- Turngren v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1982-10-12· cited 11×
- Wiseman v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1981-07-16· cited 11×
- Chairez v. James Hamilton Construction Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2009-05-15· cited 9×
- Padron v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1983-04-21· cited 8×
- Sikora v. AFD Industries, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 2004-04-16· cited 1×
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lamon v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.Washington Supreme Court· 1979-01-04· cited 177×
- Seattle-First National Bank v. TabertWashington Supreme Court· 1975-11-26· cited 151×
- Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1969-03-20· cited 144×
- Haysom v. Coleman Lantern Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1978-01-12· cited 78×
- Teagle v. Fischer & Porter Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1977-10-20· cited 77×
- Little v. PPG Industries, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 1979-05-10· cited 75×
- Estate of Ryder v. Kelly-Springfield Tire Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1978-11-30· cited 53×
- Haugen v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1976-04-22· cited 45×
- Levea v. G. A. Gray Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1977-03-28· cited 43×
- Bombardi v. Pochel's Appliance & TV Co.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1973-12-19· cited 37×
- Seay v. Chrysler CorporationWashington Supreme Court· 1980-04-24· cited 37×
- Jackson v. Standard Oil Co. of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1972-12-13· cited 30×
- Sewell v. MacRaeWashington Supreme Court· 1958-03-27· cited 28×
- Reed v. Pennwalt Corp.Washington Supreme Court· 1979-12-27· cited 28×
- Lamon v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1978-03-20· cited 25×
- Potter v. Van Waters & Rogers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1978-04-17· cited 15×
- Berry v. Coleman Systems Co.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1979-08-08· cited 15×
- Kimble v. Waste Systems International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1979-05-15· cited 14×
- Bichl v. PoinierWashington Supreme Court· 1967-06-22· cited 13×
- Cantu v. John Deere Co.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1979-11-27· cited 8×
Other cases named Bich v. General Electric Co.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.