Bethune v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding timely a claim filed within two years after the defendant learned of the potential habitual offender enhancement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Major v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2002-03-28· cited 71×
• Ey v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2008-02-28· cited 33×
• Love v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-03-20· cited 21×
• Bismark v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-09-12· cited 15×
• Cella v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-11-01· cited 10×
• Baker v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-09-12· cited 6×
• Wilson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-03-19· cited 3×
• Alguno v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-02-09· cited 3×
• Bilogan v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-12-19· cited 2×
• Russell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-02-21· cited 1×
• Sehnal v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-10-06· cited 1×
• Morris v. State 01-277 (2002)
  Superior Court of Rhode Island· 2002-07-11

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Peart v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-04-13· cited 141×
• State v. Ginebra
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1987-07-02· cited 89×
• In Re Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1988-12-30· cited 37×
• Rhodes v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-11-05· cited 28×
• State v. De Abreu
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1993-02-04· cited 20×
• Sherwood v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-11-03· cited 10×