Skip to main content

Best v. State

Citations

  • 526 A.2d 75
  • 71 Md. App. 422
  • 1987 Md. App. LEXIS 325

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a police officer’s testimony about the contents of a telephone conversation in which a third party called the defendant’s residence was admissible because it was merely offered as evidence that the call was made to arrange an illegal drug transaction
  • appellant lost any expectation of privacy he may have had in incoming telephone calls when the police lawfully entered his home

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alpert, Bloom, Karwacki

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.