Best v. Best
Citations
- 161 Pa. 515
- 29 A. 1026
- 1894 Pa. LEXIS 725
Syllabus
<p>Divorce — Adultery—Condonation—Evidence.</p> <p>On a libel for divorce, the court in this case, 'without reference to a mas, ter, found (1) that the evidence, which was conflicting and irreconcilable, failed to prove that the respondent was guilty of adultery; and (2) that, subsequent to the times on which the alleged adulterous acts were committed, the husband, claiming to have knowledge of the offence, condoned it by conjugal relations with the respondent.</p>
Judges: Dean, Green, McCollum, Mitchell, Sterrett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.