Skip to main content
· 10/6/2011

Berry v. 352 E. Virginia, L.L.C.

Citations

  • 261 P.3d 784
  • 228 Ariz. 9
  • 618 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 12
  • 2011 Ariz. App. LEXIS 171

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that buyer was the successful party because it received a monetary judgment
  • stating trial court has discretion in case involving multiple claims to determine who is the “net winner” or who is the prevailing party based on the “totality of the litigation test.”
  • “When a case involves several claims based upon different facts or legal theories . . . the court may decline to award fees for those unsuccessful separate and distinct claims.”
  • court asked to award fees has sole discretion to determine prevailing party

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Weisberg, Hall, Swann

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.