Bernstein v. Crazy Eddie, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The allegations supply as much detail of the alleged fraud as can be expected before discovery”
• “This court finds the [tjhird [cjircuit’s reasoning sound and believes it highly likely that the [sjecond [cjircuit will follow suit.”
• vacated in part on other grounds sub nom. In re Crazy Eddie Securities Litig., 714 F.Supp. 1285 (E.D.N.Y.1989)
• “[The complaint] nowhere suggests that defendants’ profits from their supposed pattern of racketeering activity were used to acquire control of Crazy Eddie; rather, they are alleged to have taken the money and run.”
• com menting favorably upon Data Access rule in dicta

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).