Morse v. Weingarten

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that reference to facts that have no merits of the case “serves no purpose except to inflame the readers”
• explaining that a fraud claim under New York law is “substantially identical” to a § 10(b) claim
• striking references to defendant’s prior criminal conviction and his income level because neither fact “bears remotely on the merits of th[e] case,” and including them “serves no purpose except to inflame the reader”
• striking references to defendant’s prior criminal conviction and his income level because neither fact “bears remotely on the merits of th[e] case,” and including them “serves no purpose except to inflame the reader”
• striking references to the defendant's criminal conviction and income level because those matters did not \bear[ ] remotely on the merits of this case ... [and] serve[d] no purpose except to inflame the reader\
• striking references to defendant’s prior criminal conviction and his income level because neither fact “bears remotely on the merits of th[e] case,” and because including them “serves no purpose except to inflame the reader”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).