Bernard v. United Brands Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• after comparing standards under rules 4 [c] and 14 [b], court noted that \[t]he merit of the proposed appeal may be a subject of inquiry under 14 [b]\
• Under either Mass.R.A.P. 4 [c], as amended, 378 Mass. 928 [1979], or Mass.R.A.P. 14 [b], as amended, 378 Mass. 939 [1979], an extension requires a showing of \circumstances that are unique or extraordinary\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).