Skip to main content

Bernard v. State

Citations

  • 540 N.E.2d 23
  • 1989 Ind. LEXIS 183
  • 1989 WL 67991

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • The comments \were prolix and only marginally improper because vague and disjointed.\
  • The comments \were prolix and only marginally improper because vague and disjointed.\
  • The comments `were prolix and only marginally improper because vague and disjointed.'
  • comments were prolix and only marginally improper because vague and disjointed
  • prosecutor’s comments on the defendant’s failure to testify were described as “condemnable”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Debruler, Shepard, Givan, Pivarnik, Dickson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.