Bernard v. Local 100, Transport Workers Union

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he protections of Title I have never been construed to encompass ... a claim where all union members have an equal right to nominate and vote for eligible candidates”
• “[I]f it is determined that [plaintiff] should have been a candidate, the union will be required to hold another election. There is no demonstration on this record that the plaintiffs would be prejudiced by such a procedure.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).