Ruffing v. 84 Lumber Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• analyzing tort with reference to both the factors set forth in section 767 and “absence of justification or privilege”
• analyzing tort with reference to both the factors set forth in section 767 and \absence of justification or privilege\
• “[A]n actor is privileged to interfere with another’s performance of a contract when: (1) the actor has a legally protected interest; (2) he acts or threatens to act to protect the interest; and (3) the threat is to protect it by proper means.”
• \[A]n actor is privileged to interfere with another's performance of a contract when: (1) the actor has a legally protected 17 interest; (2) he acts or threatens to act to protect the interest; and (3) the threat is to protect it by proper means.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).