Skip to main content
· 10/1/1974

Bergman v. Hupy

Citations

  • 221 N.W.2d 898
  • 64 Wis. 2d 747
  • 1974 Wisc. LEXIS 1390

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that statements to an assistant district attorney while seeking issuance of a criminal complaint are absolutely privileged
  • holding that statements to an assistant district attorney while seeking issuance of a criminal complaint are absolutely privileged
  • distinguishing between qualified privilege for statements to police and absolute privi lege for statements to grand jury or prosecutor
  • distinguishing between qualified privilege for statements to police and absolute privilege for statements to grand jury or prosecutor
  • applying absolute privilege to statements to assistant district attorney while seeking issuance of criminal complaint
  • applying absolute privilege to statements to assistant district attorney while seeking issuance of criminal complaint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robert W. Hansen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.