Russell v. Clark

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that even if there was some doubt as to a communication’s relevance to the proceeding, we would be required to resolve it in favor of — not against — a relation to the proceeding
• “All doubt should be resolved in favor of [a statement’s] relevancy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).