Berger v. Cas' Feed Store, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that one element of a claim for intentional interference with a contract is “[t]he defendant intentionally and improperly interfered with the contract”
• stating “a party does not improperly interfere with another’s contract by exercising its own legal rights in protection of its own financial interests”
• “[A] party does not improperly interfere with another’s contract by exercising its own legal rights in protection of its own financial interests.” (Citation omitted.)
• court erred in directing verdict where record contained “no evidence of predominant purpose of causing injury to the plaintiffs” in dispute over contract
• “[A] party does not improperly interfere with another’s contract by exercising its own legal rights in protection of its own financial interests.”
• “[A] party does not improperly interfere with another’s contract by exercising its own legal rights in protection of its own financial interests.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).