Meincke v. Northwest Bank & Trust Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting the rule that “[e]onsid-eration can be either a legal benefit to the promisor, or a legal detriment to promis-ee”
• noting plaintiff “knew, or should have known, the testimony that supported her fraud claim before trial”
• noting plaintiff “knew, or should have known, the testimony that supported her fraud claim before trial”
• noting issues may be establish either by the pleadings or the consent of the parties
• noting the rule that “[c]onsideration can be either a legal benefit to the promisor, or a legal detriment to promisee”
• noting an amendment that will substantially change the issue is not permissible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).