Bennett v. Baugh

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining rule and holding that, because the trial court did not rescind the parties’ contract, the defendant was entitled — despite having asserted a counterclaim for rescission— to recover attorney fees in successfully defending an action to enforce the contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bennett v. Baugh
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-11-24· cited 20×
• AutoLend, IAP, Inc. v. Auto Depot, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-09-27· cited 10×
• Care Medical Equipment, Inc. v. Baldwin
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2000-12-21· cited 9×
• Giulio v. BV CENTERCAL, LLC
  D. Oregon· 2011-09-06· cited 6×
• Desmarais v. Stayers, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-07-03· cited 1×
• In re Cope
  D. Oregon· 2001-08-10· cited 1×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Mattiza v. Foster
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1990-12-20· cited 147×
• Bodenhamer v. Patterson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1977-05-10· cited 56×
• Pickinpaugh v. Morton
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1974-02-14· cited 36×
• McMillan v. Golden
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1972-06-14· cited 28×
• American Petrofina Co. of Texas v. D & L Oil Supply, Inc.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1978-08-01· cited 27×
• Wilkes v. Zurlinden
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1999-06-11· cited 25×
• Niedermeyer v. Latimer
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1989-03-07· cited 13×
• Bennett v. Baugh
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-06-10· cited 5×