D. Maryland· 11/7/2018
Benisek v. Lamone
Citations
- 348 F. Supp. 3d 493
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that \the associational injury is the burden imposed on the targeted party members' ability to affiliate with their political party to carry out its activities and achieve its aims\
- finding proof of partisan effect in \the fact that the Democratic candidate was elected in the three elections following the 2011 redistricting\
- finding one justification incongruent with the \massive shifts of population and the specific targeting of Republicans\
- finding partisan effect where the design of the district resulted in a large swing in PVI
- considering notes prepared for the Senate President's \remarks to the State House and Senate Democratic Caucuses about the redistricting plan\ as evidence establishing intent
- rejecting a proffered post hoc rationalization for a district's design as unsupported by the evidence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Niemeyer, Russell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Rucho v. Common CauseSupreme Court· 2019-06-27· cited 237×
- Ohio A. Philip Randolph Inst. v. HouseholderS.D. Ohio· 2019-05-03· cited 9×
- League of Women Voters of Mich. v. BensonE.D. Michigan· 2019-04-25· cited 6×
- League of Women Voters of Mich. v. JohnsonE.D. Michigan· 2018-11-30· cited 5×
- Eugene Baten v. Henry McMasterFourth Circuit· 2020-07-27
Cites
43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court· 1992-06-12· cited 24,791×
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court· 2008-11-12· cited 11,986×
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court· 2016-05-16· cited 7,043×
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court· 1962-03-26· cited 6,173×
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court· 1976-06-28· cited 4,553×
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court· 1946-04-01· cited 4,157×
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court· 1964-10-12· cited 3,703×
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 3,080×
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court· 1958-06-30· cited 2,614×
- Republican Party of North Carolina v. MartinFourth Circuit· 1992-11-24· cited 1,890×
- Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court· 1983-04-19· cited 1,828×
- Rosenberger v. Rector & Visitors of University of VirginiaSupreme Court· 1995-06-29· cited 1,827×
- Williams v. RhodesSupreme Court· 1968-10-15· cited 1,576×
- Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.Supreme Court· 2006-05-15· cited 1,413×
- Rutan v. Republican Party of IllinoisSupreme Court· 1990-08-30· cited 1,236×
- Wesberry v. SandersSupreme Court· 1964-02-17· cited 1,150×
- Sweezy v. New Hampshire Ex Rel. WymanSupreme Court· 1957-06-17· cited 781×
- Shaw v. RenoSupreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 739×
- Moore v. OgilvieSupreme Court· 1969-06-16· cited 714×
- Kusper v. PontikesSupreme Court· 1973-11-19· cited 640×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.