Skip to main content

Benefield v. State

Citations

  • 945 N.E.2d 791
  • 2011 Ind. App. LEXIS 634
  • 2011 WL 1435847

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that counsel’s failure to object to inadmissible hearsay evidence was an objectively reasonable trial strategy to not call additional attention to the evidence
  • holding that where an appellant has failed to prove ineffective assistance of trial counsel, a finding of fundamental error on appeal is excluded
  • holding “where an appellant has failed to prove ineffective assistance of trial counsel, our holding would exclude a finding of fundamental error”
  • determining that counsel had strategic reason for decision not to object to evidence because objection may have been more damaging than evidence
  • explaining that to demonstrate ineffective assistance of trial counsel for failure to object, a petitioner must prove that an objection would have been sustained if made
  • explaining that to demonstrate ineffective assistance of trial counsel for failure to object, a petitioner must Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion 24A-PC-1025 | March 28, 2025 Page 35 of 38 prove that an objection would have been sustained if made

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Crone, Kirsch, Bradford

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

49 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.