Robert E. Eastwood v. State of Indiana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence challenged on appeal as “drumbeat repetition” of victim’s testimony was not objected to at trial and that the defendant failed to establish fundamental error with regard to the issue
• holding that evidence challenged on appeal as “drumbeat repetition” of victim’s testimony was not objected to at trial and that the defendant failed to establish fundamental error with regard to the issue
• evidence challenged on appeal as “drumbeat repetition” of victim’s testimony was not objected to at trial and defendant failed to establish fundamental error
• no prejudice in admittance of a witness’s testimony about a person’s statement; the trial court instructed the jury not to consider the testimony for the truth of the matter asserted but rather as an explanation for what the witness did next

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).