Belvin v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• performing a one-paragraph analysis of the EAJA’s statutory history without discussion or textual analysis of the term “any statute”
• relying on EAJA’s the House Committee Report and concluding “[w]e do not read § 2412(b) to subject the United States to liability for attorneys’ fees based on state laws, be they statutory or common”
• “We do not read § 2412(b) to subject the United States to liability for attorneys’ fees based on state laws, be they statutory or common.”
• “Where federal officials conspire with state officials . . . they may be held liable” under § 1983.
• interpreting the statute “to refer only to federal law”
• thirty-day filing requirement is “a mandatory, jurisdictional condition”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).