United States v. Zettie Haynes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• federal narcotics laws draw no distinctions based on quantity of heroin in substance or total quantity of mixture
• “[Actual] bias is based upon express proof, e.g., by a voir dire admission by the prospective juror of a state of mind prejudicial to a party’s interest.”
• “[Actual] bias is based upon express proof, e.g., by a voir dire 15 admission by the prospective juror of a state of mind prejudicial to a party’s 16 interest.”
• “Not only have the[] common law grounds for causal challenge [based on implied bias] retained their vitality, but to them have been added others from which prejudice or bias may be implied.” (internal citation omitted)
• “Not only have the[] common law grounds for causal challenge [based on implied bias] retained their vitality, but to them have been added others from which prejudice or bias may be implied.” (internal citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).