Eighth Circuit· 4/12/1932
Bell v. Wabash Ry. Co.
Citations
- 58 F.2d 569
- 1932 U.S. App. LEXIS 4723
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a Missouri statute similar to Va. Code § 8.01-229(E)(3) did not extend FELA’s statute of limitations because “[a] state statute cannot recreate a right given under a federal statute that has ceased to exist by the very terms of the statute.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stone, Kenyon, Cant
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Glus v. Brooklyn Eastern District TerminalSupreme Court· 1959-04-20· cited 563×
- Osbourne v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 1947-12-05· cited 127×
- Scarborough v. Atlantic Coast Line R. CoFourth Circuit· 1949-12-03· cited 109×
- Chandlee v. ShockleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1959-04-15· cited 52×
- Jens Claussen v. Mene Grande Oil Company, C.A., a Venezuela Corporation and Mene Grande Oil Company, a Delaware CorporationThird Circuit· 1960-01-26· cited 36×
- Pollen v. Ford Instrument Co.Second Circuit· 1940-01-08· cited 26×
- United States Ex Rel. Nitkey v. DawesSeventh Circuit· 1945-11-07· cited 22×
- Callahan v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co.E.D. Kentucky· 1941-09-06· cited 16×
- Hale v. Ralston Purina Co.Eighth Circuit· 1970-10-08· cited 15×
- Courtney v. Union Pacific RailroadE.D. Arkansas· 1989-04-11· cited 14×
- Wisbey v. American Community Stores CorporationD. Nebraska· 1968-08-30· cited 12×
- Carr-Consolidated Biscuit Co. v. MooreM.D. Pennsylvania· 1954-10-22· cited 12×
- Otto v. Burnett v. The New York Central Railroad CompanySixth Circuit· 1964-06-02· cited 10×
- In the Matter of CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL and PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Debtor. Appeal of CMC REAL ESTATE CORPORATIONSeventh Circuit· 1989-06-05· cited 10×
- Wahlgren v. Standard Oil Co. of New JerseyS.D. New York· 1941-10-22· cited 10×
- Taylor v. Southern Ry. Co.E.D. Illinois· 1934-03-16· cited 10×
- Fender v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1979-06-13· cited 9×
- Crescitelli v. United StatesE.D. Pennsylvania· 1946-04-26· cited 9×
- Dusek v. Pennsylvania R.Seventh Circuit· 1933-12-21· cited 8×
- Jordan v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1950-12-19· cited 7×
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Panama Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 1924-04-07· cited 561×
- Central Vermont Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court· 1915-06-21· cited 359×
- Davis v. MillsSupreme Court· 1904-05-16· cited 237×
- A. J. Phillips Co. v. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co.Supreme Court· 1915-03-22· cited 192×
- Erie Railroad v. WelshSupreme Court· 1917-01-08· cited 139×
- Reading Co. v. KoonsSupreme Court· 1926-04-12· cited 116×
- Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. BolleSupreme Court· 1931-11-23· cited 104×
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. BurnetteSupreme Court· 1915-11-29· cited 91×
- Bement v. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court· 1916-12-21· cited 68×
- Negaubauer v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1904-05-13· cited 45×
- Rademaker v. E. D. Flynn Export Co.Fifth Circuit· 1927-01-21· cited 40×
- Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. WolfSupreme Court· 1923-02-19· cited 36×
- United States v. BoomerEighth Circuit· 1910-12-19· cited 27×
- Wood & Selick, Inc. v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueSecond Circuit· 1930-08-04· cited 25×
- Kannellos v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1922-01-13· cited 22×
- Eberhart v. United States ex rel. First Nat. Bank of Belle Fourche, S. D.Eighth Circuit· 1913-03-13· cited 14×
- In re Clinchfield Nav. Co.S.D. New York· 1928-03-01· cited 12×
- Richards v. CarpenterSixth Circuit· 1919-11-05· cited 8×
- Pierson v. DavisMontana Supreme Court· 1924-03-10· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.