Bell v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• jury could conclude that defendant deceived car salesman into allowing him to test drive truck, which he then stole, “and that such deception constituted an unlawful taking”
• jury could conclude that defendant deceived car salesman into allowing him to test drive truck, which he then stole, \and that such deception constituted an unlawful taking\
• jury charge on theft by taking did not indicate that theft “could consist of the unlawful appropriation of property lawfully obtained, and thus there is no possibility that the jury based its verdict on that theory rather than the theory alleged in the indictment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Spray v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1996-10-10· cited 25×
• Brown v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-02-16· cited 18×
• McMahon v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2002-10-25· cited 13×
• Marshall v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-07-27· cited 8×
• Wilson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-07-30· cited 6×
• Elder v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-01-08· cited 4×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Williams v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1991-11-01· cited 827×
• Walker v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1978-05-09· cited 108×
• Stull v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1973-01-04· cited 64×
• Jordan v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1989-06-21· cited 11×
• Cole v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1988-03-07· cited 9×
• Mullen v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1992-02-21· cited 4×