Skip to main content

Bell v. State

Citations

  • 879 So. 2d 423
  • 2004 WL 1118599

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Failure to cite relevant authority obviates the appellate court’s obligation to review such issues.”
  • “Failure to cite relevant authority obviates the appellate court’s obligation to review such issues.”
  • “Failure to cite relevant authority obviates the appellate court’s obligation to review such issues.”
  • describing difference between abatement and stay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: En Banc

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

56 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

84 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.