Skip to main content
· 7/13/2004

Bell v. MYNT Entertainment, LLC

Citations

  • 223 F.R.D. 680
  • 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16717
  • 2004 WL 1924965

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • con- eluding that disclosure was voluntary where plaintiffs deposition questions and exhibits provided defendants with notice that privileged documents were produced to plaintiffs, and defendants did not object to their disclosure
  • “The mere existence of an attorney- client privilege relationship or the mere exchange of information with an attorney does not give rise to a presumptive claim of privilege.”
  • “It shields communications from the lawyer to the client only to the extent that these are based on, or may disclose, confidential information provided by the client or contain advice or opinions of the attorney.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jordan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.