Belcher v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that there was no evidence of “overarching scheme” for which each crime was but one part
• determining that superior court “erred in admitting the prior offense as tending to prove scheme or plan” because there was no “overarching scheme”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Willock v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2017-05-26· cited 4×
• Amerigold Holdings LLC v. Douglas Baker and Silverbow Mining LLC
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2025-08-08

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Love v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1969-08-08· cited 340×
• Smithart v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1999-09-24· cited 71×
• Coleman v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1980-10-10· cited 71×
• Moor v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1985-11-08· cited 37×
• Adkinson v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1980-05-09· cited 36×
• Smithart v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1997-10-31· cited 19×
• Bolden v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1986-06-27· cited 10×
• Khan v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2009-04-03· cited 5×
• Lewis v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2013-11-08· cited 1×