Behrend v. Comcast Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing in great detail the analyses, evidentiary support, and conclusions of Dr. Williams
• providing in great detail the analyses, evidentiary support, and conclusions of Dr. Williams
• “Once a county qualified as a benchmark for a particular year by satisfying [the DBS penetration and market share screens], it was examined to determine whether or not it had been significantly overbuilt.”
• rejecting theory of direct broadcast satellite (“DBS”) foreclosure
• rejecting theory of direct broadcast satellite (\DBS\) foreclosure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Comcast Corp. v. Behrend
  Supreme Court· 2013-03-27· cited 1,534×
• Roach v. T.L. Cannon Corp.
  Second Circuit· 2015-02-10· cited 146×
• Robert Brown v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
  Eleventh Circuit· 2016-03-21· cited 112×
• Behrend v. Comcast Corp.
  Third Circuit· 2011-08-23· cited 54×
• Dial Corp. v. News Corp.
  S.D. New York· 2015-06-18· cited 25×
• In re Nexium (Esomeprazole) Antitrust Litigation
  D. Massachusetts· 2013-11-14· cited 15×
• Howard v. Liquidity Services, Inc.
  District of Columbia· 2017-09-06· cited 14×
• In re Blood Reagents Antitrust Litigation
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2012-08-22· cited 5×
• Delgado v. Arbor Homecare Services, LLC
  Massachusetts Superior Court· 2016-05-10
• Glaberson v. Comcast Corp.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2013-11-12

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor
  Supreme Court· 1997-06-25· cited 4,991×
• General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. Falcon
  Supreme Court· 1982-06-14· cited 4,068×
• Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1961-04-03· cited 1,996×
• United Mine Workers v. Pennington
  Supreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 1,808×
• In Re: The Prudential Insurance Company Of America Sales Practices Litigation
  Third Circuit· 1998-07-23· cited 840×
• Tal v. Hogan
  Tenth Circuit· 2006-06-29· cited 788×
• In Re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust Litigation
  Third Circuit· 2009-01-16· cited 549×
• In Re New Motor Vehicles Can. Export Anti. Lit.
  First Circuit· 2008-03-28· cited 236×
• United States v. Radio Corp. of America
  Supreme Court· 1959-02-24· cited 219×
• Blades v. Monsanto Co.
  Eighth Circuit· 2005-03-07· cited 203×
• Frances Unger, William Patterson, Lead Gordon Ellis, Lead v. Amedisys Inc.
  Fifth Circuit· 2005-02-17· cited 201×
• Video International Production, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Warner-Amex Cable Communications, Inc., the City of Dallas, Cross-Appellant
  Fifth Circuit· 1988-10-31· cited 119×
• Kurt H. Eichorn v. At&T Corp
  Third Circuit· 2001-06-12· cited 76×
• Zimomra v. Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc.
  Tenth Circuit· 1997-04-22· cited 58×
• In Re Constar International Inc. Securities Litigation
  Third Circuit· 2009-10-29· cited 49×
• Westmac, Inc. v. Smith
  Sixth Circuit· 1986-07-30· cited 26×
• Weisfeld v. Sun Chemical Corp.
  D. New Jersey· 2002-10-17· cited 23×
• Jackson v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2009-08-31· cited 14×