Becker v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A proper purpose for the introduction of the evidence would be to establish motive, intent, plan, identity, bent of mind or course of conduct.”
• “A proper purpose for the introduction of the evidence would be to establish motive, intent, plan, identity, bent of mind or course of conduct.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• McMullen v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-07-09· cited 15×
• Keller v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-06-28· cited 11×
• Moore v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-02-09· cited 5×
• Tammie McMuell v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-07-09

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Stephens v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1991-07-03· cited 157×
• Nelson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-01-25· cited 20×
• Jones v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-02-09· cited 19×
• Hudson v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1999-09-20· cited 17×
• Wingfield v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-05-13· cited 11×
• Moore v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2005-07-14· cited 9×
• Ford v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-07-21· cited 5×
• Harris v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1989-02-28· cited 4×
• Screven v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1992-04-03· cited 3×