Skip to main content

Beck v. State

Citations

  • 824 P.2d 385
  • 63 O.B.A.J. 38
  • 1991 OK CR 126
  • 1991 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 134
  • 1991 WL 275193

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that in the absence of state cases interpreting a particular section of the Evidence Code, this Court will look to United States Supreme Court's construction of counterpart section in Federal Rules of Evidence
  • holding that in the absence of state cases interpreting a particular section of the Evidence Code, this Court will look to United States Supreme Court's construction of counterpart section in Federal Rules of Evidence
  • extending the holding in Woods v. State, 657 P.2d 180, 182 (Okla. Crim. App. 1983), to introduction of extrinsic evidence of a prior false accusation of rape if the victim denies the falsity of the accusation on cross-examination
  • “Although evidence that impeaches a witness for bias is routinely admitted, it is not regulated by any provision of the Evidence Code. However, in practice, this type of evidence is permitted under common law principles.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lumpkin, Vice-Presiding, Lane, Brett, Johnson, Parks

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.