Skip to main content
· 10/16/2013

Beaver v. Tarsadia Hotels

Citations

  • 978 F. Supp. 2d 1124
  • 2013 WL 5671163
  • 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148987

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “courts broadly construe relevancy in the context of discovery” and that “[r]elevance for discovery purposes is defined more broadly than relevance for evidentiary purposes”
  • noting that “courts broadly construe relevancy in the context of discovery” and that “[r]elevance for discovery purposes is defined more broadly than relevance for evidentiary purposes”
  • explaining that “courts broadly construe relevancy in the context of discovery”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Curiel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.