· 10/16/2013
Beaver v. Tarsadia Hotels
Citations
- 978 F. Supp. 2d 1124
- 2013 WL 5671163
- 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148987
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “courts broadly construe relevancy in the context of discovery” and that “[r]elevance for discovery purposes is defined more broadly than relevance for evidentiary purposes”
- noting that “courts broadly construe relevancy in the context of discovery” and that “[r]elevance for discovery purposes is defined more broadly than relevance for evidentiary purposes”
- explaining that “courts broadly construe relevancy in the context of discovery”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Curiel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.