Skip to main content

Beasley v. State

Citations

  • 136 So. 3d 393
  • 2014 WL 172114
  • 2014 Miss. LEXIS 28

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming because an adequate competency hearing was held after the mental evaluation
  • affirming because an adequate competency hearing was held after the mental evaluation
  • the Court affirmed on the ground that an adequate competency hearing had been held after the mental evaluation
  • the Court affirmed on the ground that an adequate competency hearing had been held after the mental evaluation
  • “The standard of review for a post-trial motion is abuse of discretion.”
  • \The standard of review for a post-trial motion is abuse of discretion.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chandler, Coleman, Dickinson, King, Kitchens, Lamar, Pierce, Randolph, Waller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.