Baugh v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to address argument trial court should have heard testimony regarding whether defendant was sexually violent predator where defense encouraged trial court to “make that determination based upon the charge . . . and the doctors’ reports”
• “Under the invited error doctrine, a party may not take advantage of an error that she commits, invites, or which is the natural consequence of her own neglect or misconduct.” (internal quotation omitted)
• “Under the invited error doctrine, a party may not take advantage of an error that she commits, invites, or which is the natural consequence of her own neglect or misconduct.” (internal quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Steven E. Malloch v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2012-12-21· cited 19×
• Scott D. Hartman v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2015-11-10
• Joseph T. Ford, III v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2015-11-18
• Timothy J. Miles v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2017-05-24
• Brent N. Draime v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2017-12-27

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Wright v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2005-06-07· cited 233×
• Witte v. Mundy Ex Rel. Mundy
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2005-01-06· cited 69×
• Marlett v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2007-12-28· cited 27×
• Baugh v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2010-05-05· cited 5×