Bauer v. Bauer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ‘‘inability of an obligor to pay court-ordered alimony, without fault on his part, is a good defense to a contempt motion’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Spencer v. Spencer
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2017-10-31· cited 10×
• Casiraghi v. Casiraghi
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2020-10-13· cited 7×
• In re Bianca K.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2019-02-26· cited 6×
• Brendon A. Boyce v. Julie A. Jarvis, f/k/a Julie A. Boyce
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 2021-06-30· cited 5×
• Giordano v. Giordano
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2020-09-15· cited 3×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Sanchione v. Sanchione
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1977-08-16· cited 125×
• Blake v. Blake
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-04-26· cited 112×
• Bornemann v. Bornemann
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-07-21· cited 111×
• Afkari-Ahmadi v. Fotovat-Ahmadi
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-12-29· cited 37×
• Simms v. Simms
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-08-14· cited 31×
• Auerbach v. Auerbach
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2009-03-24· cited 28×
• Meehan v. Meehan
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1996-01-16· cited 27×
• Schade v. Schade
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2008-09-02· cited 18×
• Rosato v. Rosato
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2003-05-27· cited 16×
• Malpeso v. Malpeso
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2016-05-03· cited 15×
• Mekrut v. Suits
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2014-01-28· cited 8×
• Brown v. Brown
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2011-08-02· cited 7×