Skip to main content

Batey v. State

Citations

  • 958 So. 2d 339
  • 2006 Ala. LEXIS 323
  • 2006 WL 3334490

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Alabama courts have repeatedly held that an argument about the adequacy of the State’s evidence is not jurisdictional and is therefore barred by Rule 32.2.”
  • \Alabama courts have repeatedly held that an argument about the adequacy of the State's evidence is not jurisdictional and is therefore barred by Rule 32.2.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: See, Nabers, Harwood, Stuart, Bolin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.