Court of Appeals of Arizona· 4/8/1965
Bates v. Bates
Citations
- 400 P.2d 593
- 1 Ariz. App. 165
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding wife could maintain an action to recover the value of real estate not disclosed in a stipulated decree
- holding wife could maintain an action to recover the value of real estate not disclosed in a stipulated decree
- allowing damages action, under extrinsic fraud exception to res judicata, for nondisclosures of the type alleged here
- noting equitable relief from a dissolution decree may be justified by conduct that “has prevented a fair submission of the controversy”
- “Extrinsic fraud may also consist of deception practiced by the successful party in purposely keeping his opponent in ignorance.”
- when judgment is the product of extrinsic fraud, “equity will act to prevent a failure of justice, for fraud is the arch enemy of equity”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Donofrio, Cameron-, Shelley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Dressler v. MorrisonArizona Supreme Court· 2006-03-23· cited 69×
- Cal X-Tra v. W.V.S v. Holdings, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2012-04-24· cited 58×
- Veach v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court· 1967-05-04· cited 39×
- Alvarado v. ThomsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2016-05-31· cited 27×
- Mr. G v. Mrs. GCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-10-30· cited 26×
- State Ex Rel. Corbin v. Arizona Corp. CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1984-10-30· cited 23×
- McNeil v. HoskynsCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2014-09-30· cited 22×
- Warfield v. AlanizD. Arizona· 2006-09-05· cited 18×
- Pilati v. PilatiMontana Supreme Court· 1979-04-04· cited 17×
- Wine v. WineCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1971-02-23· cited 15×
- Arnold v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-04-15· cited 12×
- Gavrilis v. GavrilisColorado Court of Appeals· 2005-06-09· cited 12×
- In re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. A-25646Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1981-12-10· cited 6×
- Best v. BestMontana Supreme Court· 1982-12-29· cited 3×
- In re the Marriage of FloresCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2012-11-20· cited 2×
- Flores v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2012-11-20
- In re the Marriage of Susan Gayle Hutchinson and Robert Gregory Hutchinson, In re the Marriage of Susan Gayle Hutchinson and Robert Gregory Hutchinson v. Upon the Petition of Susan Gayle Hutchinson, And Concerning Robert Gregory HutchinsonSupreme Court of Iowa· 2022-05-20
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.