Arizona Supreme Court· 3/23/2006

Dressler v. Morrison

Citations

130 P.3d 978
212 Ariz. 279
474 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 6
2006 Ariz. LEXIS 42

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

applying de novo review to legal issues underlying dismissal of complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6)
appellate court will “uphold dismissal only if the plaintiff would not be entitled to relief under any facts susceptible of proof in the statement of the claim”
“The legislature also specified a remedy for [when a dissolution decree does not dispose of all community property]: Former spouses will hold the property as tenants in common.”
\We review an order granting a motion to dismiss for abuse of discretion.\
“Under the doctrine of claim preclusion, a final 5 judgment on the merits in a prior suit involving the same parties or their privies bars a 6 second suit based on the same claim.”
“We granted review to determine whether a party may bring a separate civil action for relief, rather than file a Rule 60(c) motion, when the party alleges ownership in real property not disposed of in a dissolution decree.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGregor, Berch, Ryan, Hurwitz, Bales

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.