Basso v. Campos

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• it might be helpful to add that Smith v. Runkle was affirmed for the reasons stated below with respect to the first question in the case, 86 N.J. Eq. 257 ( E. & A. 1916), and with respect to the second question, sub nom. Smith v. Scholfield, 98 A. 1087 ( E. & A. 1916)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).