Bartley v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that objective of Rule 4(B) was satisfied where defendant was released on his own recognizance before the seventy-day period had expired

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Patrick Austin v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2013-11-15· cited 143×
• Camm v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2004-08-10· cited 35×
• Feuston v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2011-08-19· cited 21×
• Mork v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2009-08-28· cited 18×
• Moore v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2005-05-23· cited 18×
• State v. Delph
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2007-10-26· cited 13×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Stephenson v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2001-01-25· cited 148×
• Williams v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1994-04-18· cited 47×
• Kirby v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2002-08-29· cited 37×
• Bell v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1993-03-09· cited 31×
• Bell v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1993-10-14· cited 27×
• Diaz v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2001-08-09· cited 25×
• Hornaday v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1994-08-22· cited 14×