Bartlett v. Bartlett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where the court eventually rejected the defense because the defendant admitted that he in fact had possession of the “lost” records

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Blisset v. Blisset
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1988-06-20· cited 90×
• Tiokasin v. Haas
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1985-06-27· cited 37×
• Hoos v. Hoos
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1980-07-22· cited 23×
• Blisset v. Blisset
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1986-07-03· cited 9×
• Ruster v. Ruster
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1980-12-24· cited 9×
• In Re Marriage of Jorczak
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2000-08-29· cited 7×
• In re Marriage of Divarco
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1988-02-23· cited 7×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ellingwood v. Ellingwood
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1975-01-20· cited 34×
• Anderson v. Anderson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1964-04-29· cited 31×
• Nelson v. Nelson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1950-05-23· cited 18×
• Daum v. Daum
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1973-05-04· cited 16×