Hoos v. Hoos

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• modification of child support is at the court’s discretion and administered prospectively, as past-due amounts are the vested of the recipient
• “[a]cquiescence or even silence is not a de facto approval” and “respondent’s reliance on such acquiescence would not constitute a detrimental change of position”
• “estoppel arises where the voluntary conduct of one party results in good faith reliance and detrimental change of position by the other party. Where such circumstances exist, estoppel may act to bar the assertion of rights by the party whose voluntary acts led to the reliance”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).