Skip to main content

Barry v. State

Citations

  • 934 So. 2d 656
  • 2006 WL 2191323

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting gathering crowds and people stopping to watch are not sufficient to establish a disorderly conduct charge
  • finding the evidence insufficient to support conviction for disorderly conduct where defendant yelled obscenities and shook his finger in a police officer’s face, and the public confrontation slowed traffic
  • collecting cases; holding that defendant screaming obscenities at police officer while pointing and shaking a finger in her face did not support a conviction for disorderly conduct despite crowd of observers
  • “[T]he mere fact that other people come outside or stop to watch what is going on is insufficient to support a conviction for disorderly conduct.”
  • “[I]t is clear that speech alone will not generally support a conviction for disorderly conduct.”
  • evidence insufficient to support conviction for disorderly conduct where defendant yelled obscenities and shook his finger in a police officer’s face and the public confrontation slowed traffic

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stringer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.