Barri v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Analysis under [the due process clause of the California Constitution] differs from that conducted pursuant to the federal due process clause in that the claimant need not establish a property or liberty interest as a prerequisite to invoking due process protection.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• San Francisco Taxi Coalition v. City & County of San Francisco
  Ninth Circuit· 2020-11-09· cited 9×
• Precision Framing Systems Inc. v. Luzuriaga
  California Court of Appeal· 2019-08-29
• Atwell Island Water Dist. v. Atwell Island Water Dist.
  California Court of Appeal· 2020-02-24
• Atwell Island Water Dist. v. Atwell Island Water Dist.
  California Court of Appeal· 2020-02-27
• Mireskandari v. Gallagher
  California Court of Appeal· 2020-12-30
• Mireskandari v. Gallagher
  California Court of Appeal· 2021-01-21
• Best v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
  California Court of Appeal· 2021-05-21
• People v. Czirban
  California Court of Appeal· 2022-04-27
• Assn. for L.A. Deputy Sheriffs v. County of L.A.
  California Court of Appeal· 2023-08-21
• Mendoza v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 2024-07-15

Cites

45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Mathews v. Eldridge
  Supreme Court· 1976-02-24· cited 16,859×
• United States v. Salerno
  Supreme Court· 1987-05-26· cited 5,104×
• Powell v. Alabama
  Supreme Court· 1932-11-07· cited 4,979×
• American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. Sullivan
  Supreme Court· 1999-05-24· cited 3,121×
• Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.
  Supreme Court· 1982-03-02· cited 2,744×
• Wheat v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1988-06-30· cited 1,962×
• Smith v. Doe
  Supreme Court· 2003-03-05· cited 1,492×
• United States v. Ursery
  Supreme Court· 1996-06-24· cited 1,314×
• Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1989-06-22· cited 804×
• United States v. Monsanto
  Supreme Court· 1989-06-22· cited 461×
• Tobe v. City of Santa Ana
  California Supreme Court· 1995-04-24· cited 388×
• Today's Fresh Start, Inc. v. Los Angeles County Office of Education
  California Supreme Court· 2013-07-11· cited 223×
• Hughes v. Board of Architectural Examiners
  California Court of Appeal· 1998-03-26· cited 196×
• Uhlrig v. Harder
  Tenth Circuit· 1995-08-30· cited 150×
• Conservatorship of Hofferber
  California Supreme Court· 1980-09-15· cited 137×
• CHARLES J. VACANTI v. State Comp. Ins. Fund
  California Supreme Court· 2001-01-04· cited 129×
• Lockley v. Law Office of Cantrell, Green, Pekich, Cruz & McCort
  California Court of Appeal· 2001-08-21· cited 114×
• Clark v. City of Hermosa Beach
  California Court of Appeal· 1996-08-21· cited 105×
• Coleman v. DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL ADMININISTRATION
  California Supreme Court· 1991-02-25· cited 105×
• Bruce v. Gregory
  California Supreme Court· 1967-02-06· cited 96×