Skip to main content

Barrera v. State

Citations

  • 982 S.W.2d 415
  • 1998 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 128
  • 1998 WL 692484

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that Doyle was pre-Almanza case that overemphasized importance of procedurally perfect jury charge and application paragraph in particular
  • holding error to include abstract self-defense instruction but fail to instruct jury to acquit if it had reasonable doubt on self-defense
  • holding trial court committed charge error when it sua sponte included abstract defensive instruction in jury charge but failed to include instruction in application paragraph
  • affirming that a trial court errs by failing to apply the law of self-defense to the facts of the case
  • reiterating that trial court has no duty to put defensive issue in the charge sua sponte, including self defense
  • holding that a trial court has no duty to sua sponte charge the jury on unrequested defensive issues raised by the evidence, but if the trial court on its own does instruct the jury on an issue then it signals that the defense was “the law applicable to the case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keller, McCormick, Mansfield, Price, Holland, Womack, Baird, Overstreet, Meyers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

101 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.