Skip to main content
· 9/16/2004

Barrera v. Brooklyn Music, Ltd.

Citations

  • 346 F. Supp. 2d 400
  • 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18883
  • 2004 WL 2101929

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the plaintiff failed to provide any evidence that monthly gross revenues were reasonably related to infringement and declining to award actual damages based on infringer’s profits
  • noting that a reasonable license fee looks at “type of use, size of use, and circulation”
  • “[D]istrict courts have discretion to grant appropriate process server fees to the extent that they do not exceed the costs that would have been incurred had the Marshals’ office effected service”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robert L. Carter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.