Barnette v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that by failing to renew an objection concerning jury selection appellant did not preserve the issue for appellate review
• “[T]he appellant did not properly preserve this issue for appellate review because he failed to renew his objection and motion for mistrial before the jury was sworn.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bell v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2013-02-07· cited 29×
• Berry v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-08-22· cited 11×
• Aragon v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-09-05· cited 2×
• Fredrick v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-12-06
• Ahrens v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-12-19

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Melbourne v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1996-09-05· cited 356×
• Joiner v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1993-05-13· cited 167×
• Pope v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1996-06-13· cited 105×
• Franqui v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1997-07-03· cited 44×
• State v. Fuchs
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-09-14· cited 33×
• Karp v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-07-30· cited 13×
• Rollins v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-02-25· cited 11×
• State v. Fuchs
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-10-08· cited 7×